[Coladam] Coladam Digest, Vol 88, Issue 35

Jim Notini jnoti2 at comcast.net
Wed Oct 31 22:40:22 CET 2012


Yes, Lyle Marschand was devote in his beliefs, but he still hired me to 
manage his computer store and take over operations of NIAD, so he must have 
seen something good in me.   ;- )

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <shonmccallum at juno.com>
To: <coladam at adamcon.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Coladam] Coladam Digest, Vol 88, Issue 35


> This reminds me of the awesome Bible devotional that NIAD published at the 
> beginning of every newsletter.  Also there was a Jeopardy Bible question 
> pack that someone made for the ADAM. One can believe the Bible is 100% 
> historically accurate and at the time believe in observational science 
> that proofs the Bible is true.
> http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v7/n4/ten-best-evidences?utm_source=homepage&utm_medium=banner&utm_campaign=10-evidences-campaign
>
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------
> From: coladam-request at adamcon.org
> To: coladam at adamcon.org
> Subject: Coladam Digest, Vol 88, Issue 35
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:00:01 +0100
>
> Send Coladam mailing list submissions to
> coladam at adamcon.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://adamcon.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/coladam
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> coladam-request at adamcon.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> coladam-owner at adamcon.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Coladam digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: between earthquakes and hurricanes... (Rob Bairos)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 06:54:24 -0400
> From: Rob Bairos <rbairos at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Coladam] between earthquakes and hurricanes...
> To: coladam at adamcon.org
> Message-ID:
> <CAH80WYZ26kYEm7mr_Vcu3GddsWam0v8xPsv5iG33q2WzEueaTA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> "I'll trust God's word over your science any day of the week."
>
> As communicated by the man typing on a computer over a worldwide network
> of nodes, satellites and routers also known as the internet...
>
> And no, you are not trusting God's word. Thats dishonest. You  know
> perfectly well the Bible is full of literally non-true statements,
> that youve come to reinterpret as 'figurative' as necessary.
> Previous men much more holier than you swore up and down about the literal
> interpretation of many more statements you claim as figurative today.
>
> "You have science, I have God. He's never been wrong. Science is always
> finding itself to be wrong. I rest my case."
>
> Again you're lying.  Science doesn't claim truth, its promotes accuracy.
> Theory of gravity predicts motions of objects with a certain degree of
> accuracy, that can be double blind tested by 'non-believers' so to speak.
> Your claim that 'God is never wrong' is merely the observation that you
> will reinterpret non-specific writings as necessary, much like someone
> will claim their generic factory printed fortune cookie speaks to them
> directly.
>
> "He catches the wise in their craftiness";^and again, "The Lord
> knows that the thoughts of the wise are futile."
> 1 Corinthians 3:18-20
>
> Hey thats great. The bible is true? Why? Because it says its true.
> This is no different than any other self-referential writing, even
> spiritual writings like the Vedas from ancient Inda that predate
> Abrahamic writings by a long shot.
>
> "Your answers and Earthly ideas are just more proof that the Bible is
> truth."
>
> Making assertions is not the same thing as providing evidence they are
> true..
>
> "The Bible even has information that took thousands of years
> of science to finally agree with."
>
> No it does not.
> But feel free to throw out some vague poetry that you've tortured into
> a summary of Quantum Mechanics, or interplanetary motion, etc..
> Its always amusing when someone pretends volumes of mathematical or
> scientific investigation are somehow equivalent to a cherry-picked
> christian/muslim/vedic/scientologist line of poetry.
>
> Or maybe you're confusing knowledge that was well known in its day
> with proof of divine origin. In that case, let us stop arguing and praise
> the might Zeus, given that the ancient Greeks developed a consistent
> model of geometry and number theory.
>
> Cheers
> Rob
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Coladam mailing list
> Coladam at adamcon.org
> http://adamcon.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/coladam
>
>
> End of Coladam Digest, Vol 88, Issue 35
> ***************************************
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Woman is 53 But Looks 25
> Mom reveals 1 simple wrinkle trick that has angered doctors...
> http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/509166fe791d166fe084est03vuc
> _______________________________________________
> Coladam mailing list
> Coladam at adamcon.org
> http://adamcon.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/coladam
> 




More information about the Coladam mailing list